Settling the termination for convenience of a prime contract or subcontract can be complex. Most interestingly, the rules covering termination for convenience settlements provide considerable opportunities to maximize recovery on terminations when they are properly documented and presented in a termination for convenience settlement proposal. There are a wide variety of types of costs that can be legitimately included in a termination for convenience settlement proposal where such costs in other proposals would not be allowable (e.g. idle capacity, direct charges of normal indirect costs, precontract costs). In addition the documentation requirements are less strict than those that might be required under an incurred cost proposal. Under most circumstances, our fees are 100% reimbursable by the government.
Our termination consulting practice benefits from our staff’s experience of being on “both sides of the table.” We have audited and negotiated termination for convenience proposals as former auditors, contracting officers and termination contracting officers. We have prepared hundreds of termination for convenience settlement proposals over the last 20 years where as T for C consultants, we understand the administrative requirements thoroughly and the best way to quantify the termination proposal to achieve the best possible outcome. We are acknowledged specialists in the area of termination for convenience settlement proposals where we have extensively researched the regulations and cases and published many articles in the GCA DIGEST and GCA REPORT. Since virtually all termination consulting expenses are recoverable in the termination proposal, clients can rely heavily on our efforts and have our termination for convenience consulting fees paid by the government.
Our termination for convenience consulting services include:
© 2024 Government Contract Associates. All Rights Reserved.